Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Henry's avatar

The stablecoin vs. CBDC debate is not just regulatory; it’s ideological. Private stablecoins promote decentralization and financial inclusion without direct government control, while CBDCs are centralized and, for many, raise privacy concerns. The Treasury’s support for CBDCs might not align with the public's desire for financial autonomy.

Expand full comment
Williamharris's avatar

Stablecoins are essentially functioning like shadow banks, holding massive amounts of U.S. debt and even influencing Treasury yields. This raises the question: should they be regulated as banks, or will new frameworks emerge? It's a balancing act between leveraging their demand for T-Bills and ensuring they don't pose systemic risks, especially if a major player like Tether collapses.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts